Rated R for some violence, disturbing images and language
Running Time: 120 min
Danny Boyle has finally made his masterpiece and that film, Slumdog Millionaire, is one of the greatest movies I have ever seen.
Fate is the main idea playing out in the film. When the film opens, we are given a question, typical of one found on the popular game show:
Jamal Malik is one question away from winning 20 million rupees. How did he do it?
A. He cheated
B. He’s lucky
C. He’s a genius
D. It is written
Jamal is a young man from Mumbai, India and is the latest contestant on the Indian version of Who Wants to be a Millionaire? By the time the movie begins, Jamal has answered every question correctly and only needs one more correct answer to win the contest. The show’s very seedy host finds it difficult to believe that an uneducated kid from the slums of India could answer all the questions that doctors and lawyers have trouble with. As a result, the host has Jamal arrested and charged with fraud following the show and, as the movie begins, we see Jamal being tortured by the local police, demanding he confess to cheating.
The movie plays out with flashbacks intercutting scenes of his police interrogation and scenes from his childhood, in which Boyle creates a story brilliant in the execution. Each of the flashback scenes follow a question from the game show as Jamal explains to the police inspector how he knew the answers to the questions. His story proves that a person does not have to be highly educated to know the answers but simply be in the right place at the right time. In some cases, it might be better described as the wrong place at the wrong time.
Jamal and his brother Salim came from the poorest slums of India and, following a massacre in their home town, find themselves scavengers, living on the streets fending for themselves. It is here that Jamal meets a girl named Latika, who he immediately connects to. Jamal considers the three of them to be a modern day Three Musketeers, inseparable and together till the end. In these scenes, the characters are played by a trio of very talented youngsters who prove up to the challenge that lies before them. They are taken into the care of an orphanage that is actually a front for a gangster named Maman, who makes all the children work the streets begging for money daily. It is at this point the youngsters start down different roads, led by their individual fates.
When you see everything Jamal went through in his young life, you find yourself behind him every step of the way. He is not perfect and he is, in fact, single mindedly stubborn and infatuated to a fault. However, he is a good, honest person and is painted with a deft touch making him sympathetic throughout his misadventures. His older brother Salim is the antithesis of Jamal, a go-getter willing to do whatever is necessary to get ahead in life. Along the way, Salim takes every opportunity to hold Jamal down, cheating and stealing from his brother and doing everything he can to stand in the way of Jamal’s attempts to reconnect with Latika. However, when the chips are down, he is still the protective older brother, willing to do whatever is needed to protect his sibling. No one in this film is painted in a coat of black and white and the most interesting characters are displayed in varying shades of gray.
I find it amazing that the man who directed 28 Days Later made this film. I love that film and Boyle shows nice touches with his shot selection and editing in the horror flick but this film is on a completely different level. There are touches of the familiar Boyle filmmaking style, such as the urgency when the boys are pursued down the street by the local police and the grainy, documentary style he utilizes in many of the flashbacks. However, this movie possesses a heart that is displayed through its direction, adding to the already ingenious script design using transitions through time.
Boyle has always been a director willing to take chances when choosing his shots. This is evident in his earlier works, such as Trainspotting and Shallow Grave, as well as his more recent hit Sunshine. Slumdog Millionaire takes everything he did in those earlier films and, to steal a concept from another movie, cranks it up to eleven. When the movie reaches its climax, you learn why Jamal, a man who doesn’t care about the money, would enter into the show to begin with. Boyle directs the scene at the climax, where Jamal is asked the final question, with so much tension and suspense the audience remains on the edge of their seats. Because it doesn’t matter if Jamal wins or not, the audience has no idea what is going to happen and Boyle milks that uncertainty ending the movie on the highest of notes.
The acting, from top to bottom is spectacular. There are three different people playing Jamal, Salim and Latika throughout the movie and all are great. All three young actors who play Jamal are at the top of their game, which is astonishing since the oldest (Dev Patel) is only eighteen. Freida Pinto, who plays the elder version of Latika is radiant and a beauty to behold. There is a sadness in her eyes that makes Latika such a wonderful character. Perennial Bollywood star Anil Kapoor (110 films at the age of 49) gives the game show host just the right amount of slimy seediness. Finally, Irrfan Khan plays the police inspector as someone you realize you can trust, not the stereotypical police thug he could have been passed off as. It is another case where the characters that are most interesting, from the police inspector to the kids all the way to the game show host, are not good or bad guys. They are all individuals tinted in shades of gray.
The movie ends with a giant Bollywood styled dance number that allows the audience to leave the theater with a smile on their faces. By this time, Slumdog Millionaire has accomplished something rare in Hollywood today. It takes a culture in India and shows us the lowest of lows in the slums of Mumbai to the highest of highs at the Taj Mahal but never loses focus. The film scans the gamut of almost eleven years, but never seems to be taking in too much. Much of the plot rests in the hands of children, but all are up to the challenge and none disappoint. The film tethers near the melodramatic but never steps over the line. The script is a story of a young man’s life and the film breaks its pace at points as it jumps through time, but it never bores and rarely seems to drag on.
I have to expect this was not an easy movie to make and was a hard effort to carry out. At the end, Danny Boyle pulls it off and created the greatest movie in his already solid career. Slumdog Millionaire is one of the best films you will see from 2008, and with the awards recognition it is beginning to get a wider release. You would do yourself a favor by setting out to find this film. Only the hardest of hearts will leave disappointed.
The 411: Slumdog Millionaire is not a simple film, but an elaborate production directed with such a deft touch surrounded by performers who leave their heart and souls in the story. The cinematography and music add to the flavor and this is a movie that should attract all movie lovers, regardless of age or gender. It is not only one of the best films of 2008 but one of the best films of recent memory. This is a story that starts similar to Oliver Twist and then becomes a thriller and a romance all in one tight package. If Danny Boyle never directed another movie again, he could retire now knowing Slumdog Millionaire is a true masterpiece.
Shawn, great review that I agree 100% with. I'd saw Slumdog Millionaire this weekend and would like to second the notion that it's simply one of the best films I've EVER seen. Everybody out there who hasn't seen this yet, do yourself a favor and go to the theater as soon as you finish reading Shawn's review; it is THAT good.
Thank you, Mr. Lealos, for a great write-up.
Posted By: Rick Tym (Registered) on January 25, 2009 at 12:38 AM
I would have to say no to your review. I went to watch the movie last night and walked out 30 min into it..
Posted By: Guest#3607 (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 01:08 AM
I would have to say no to your review. I went to watch the movie last night and walked out 30 min into it..
Well then you're not smart, because that movie was fantastic, and worthy of a 10 rating. It was a love story that you found yourself rooting for the couple while watching... and I can't remember the last time I actually cared about the couple getting together. The movie deserves all the credit. It's human, it's raw, and it's fantastically written. It is the best movie of 2008 without question, and deserves a nod come Oscar time for sure.
Posted By: Dan (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 01:43 AM
Walked out 30 minutes in?
You wasted money.
It truly is the best movie of the year and one of the best of all time! This is the only movie I know that truly made me happy, sad, angry, and loved...they pulled off everything perfectly. Great movie, it deserves best picture and every other award it is nominated for!
Posted By: Guest#9198 (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 01:49 AM
I run a small, arthouse theater in downtown Ann Arbor, MI. We're KILLING with Slumdog Millionaire. Last night this guy walks out half way through and asks for his money back. He said it was too brutal and that he couldn't take it, and to boot, "I simply can't understand why the other theatergoers are laughing." Well, when COMEDIC RELIEF happens, people laugh. I mean sure, the film has some brutal moments, but people like this can't handle the truth of life. Children forced to sing and beg for money? The bad singers are blinded to garner more sympathy from tourists? Guess what buddy, this shit happens.
Anyway, good review on an amazing film. Seriously, go see this. Come to my theater, while you're at it.
Posted By: Nick (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 01:59 AM
I would have to say no to your review. I went to watch the movie last night and walked out 30 min into it..
Posted By: Guest#3607 (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 01:08 AM
You sir have no heart.. ALLAH!!!!
Posted By: Mr E (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 02:02 AM
I am an Indian , and this is the best movie i have seen in my life.
People all over INdia are starting to wake up to the reality that India has a lot of slums , and rich people are coming forward to help.
Danny Boyle Said in bombay that a part of the BOX OFFICE Collections will be donated to develop the slum areas .
Bombay had a bad year , and this is the only good news we have had.
Please do NOT bash this movie .
The team of this film never lobbied Like HARVEY WEINSTEIN , they just made a film they believed in. Milk , and Button = the only reason these films were made Was to win awards.NOTHING ELSE.
Slumdog is a victory for creativity.
It is the best film of the year by far , and i hope there is no senseless backlash for it. If we lose this Oscar race , TRUST ME , All OF INDIA will be very sad.
India needs something to celebrate right now after a bad 2008. And i hope the Academy chooses hope over fear , optimism over cynicism .
I Do not know whether this film will win or not , but i was very happy to see it .
Those were 2 of the best hours of my life.
Why is SLUMDOG the best film of 2008? A) It's something we haven't seen a million times before
B) The acting is incredible
C) It tells a compelling, alternately heart-wrenching and heartwarming story D) Director Danny Boyle captures Mumbai in all its complexities, but never loses sight of each individual
character
This film will be remembered forever .
It seems to be written.
Posted By: Amy (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 03:21 AM
Then you missed a great movie. If you only saw 30 minutes, you have no qualifications to say anything about it at all.
Posted By: Shawn S. Lealos (Registered) on January 25, 2009 at 03:31 AM
The next time Guest#3607 decides to comment, the very least he/she needs to do is watch the ENTIRE film. Slumdog Millionaire is brilliant. One of the finest crafted films of the past 50 years.
Posted By: James (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 03:34 AM
Why is SLUMDOG the best film of 2008?
A) It's something we haven't seen a million times before
B) The acting is incredible
C) It tells a compelling, alternately heart-wrenching and heartwarming story
D) Director Danny Boyle captures Mumbai in all its complexities, but never loses sight of each individual character
Posted By: Ellen (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 04:52 AM
Great movie, great review.
Posted By: Guest#2117 (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 07:26 AM
It was good, but flawed. It really could've used a stronger narrative.
Posted By: Ben Quick (Registered) on January 25, 2009 at 07:39 AM
Slumdog Millionaire was good, but Behind Enemy Lines: Colombia was MUCH better.
Posted By: Tasi (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 11:40 AM
I walked out after 45 minutes, seriously.
I don't know, I guess it just wasn't my type of movie. The characters annoyed me, especially the brother of the main character.
Posted By: Leo (Guest) on January 25, 2009 at 05:51 PM
I also agree with the disagree-ers. I downloaded it only because of everyone saying how great it is. Watched about 10-15 minutes and deleted it. Obviously I can't judge the whole movie on just the part I saw, but honestly, what I saw was boring and did not interest me in the slightest.
Posted By: bob (Guest) on January 26, 2009 at 08:11 AM
Good film. Well executed. Not a perfect 10.
In that order.
Posted By: mr_wishart (Guest) on January 27, 2009 at 10:46 AM
Scenes of poverty and squalour may appear romantic to Westerners and to our snooty elite but for ordinary Indians they are an everyday reality. One wonders what sort of mind can find such images aesthetically pleasing. Party-hopping socialites (for example, Shobhaa De after all her bombast of "enough is enough" after the Mumbai attack, went and watched a pirated copy!) who are distanced from such reality may find this film an "eye-opener" but for us it IS just poverty-porn. Leaving that aside, I have eight other objections to the film.
1) The director seems to RELISH showing violence. Some of it (like the police-torture) is quite needless. And why was the boy arrested in the first place? On what charge? Was it realistic?
2) How can a boy growing up in slums speak such accented English? Even if one assumes that the language he actually uses to communicate with the game-show host and the police officer is Hindi (granting the director the creative license to use a language better suited for international audiences), there are 2 instances where it is stretched too far: (a) when the boy becomes a ‘guide’ for foreign tourists at the Taj Mahal & (b) when he becomes a substitute-operator at the call-centre.
3) When the boy uses his ‘lifeline’ during the game-show, his friend discovers that she has forgotten her mobile and has to run back for it. This is plain Bollywood masala! Did the director HAVE to make it so melodramatic?
4) How did the boy know who invented the revolver just by watching his brother use it?
How does his friend know about Benjamin Franklin?
5) “Darshan Do Ghanshyam” is NOT written by Surdas. It is written by Gopal Singh Nepali for the movie Narsi Bhagat (1957). This song is also credited as traditional and originally written by 15th century poet Narsi Mehta, whose life that film is based on.
6) After winning the game-show, the boy sits on the railway platform and nobody recognizes him! Considering the popularity of the show, is that realistic?
7) Two glaring omissions: To qualify for the show one has to answer several GK questions over phone or Internet. Even after making it to the show, a contestant can reach the hot-seat, only after “fastest finger first”. All this is conveniently forgotten in the film.
8) And of course the greatest flaw in the storyline: programmes like 'Kaun Banega Crorepati' and 'Who Wants To Be A Millionaire' are NOT telecast live. As a result the entire structure of the film becomes unrealistic. For a film that boasts of being realistic such a flaw cannot be overlooked.
Anyone else wants to say this is a great film despite all the eight points above?
Posted By: Sambit (Guest) on January 28, 2009 at 05:58 AM
"Bombay had a bad year , and this is the only good news we have had.
Please do NOT bash this movie."
Its a movie! If he didn't like it, fine. So it told the truth, at the end of the day its still a *great* movie.
Posted By: Guest#3040 (Guest) on January 28, 2009 at 02:07 PM
Everyday reality????
Says the guy on who not only is using a computer, but using the internet. Don't try to act all high and mighty. You're far from it.
The movie shows that even people that are the lowest of lows can reach what they really want in life.
Something that people in the ENTIRE world (that includes India, in case you use of googlemaps couldn't help you with that) want in their lives.
Posted By: To Sambit (Guest) on February 01, 2009 at 11:20 PM
It took about four days of reflecting on this movie before I could really figure out if I *actually* liked this film or if I was falling for the hype and I think I've survived the hype machine and have been able to find "Slumdog" as a good movie but not a classic movie and not a 10 out of 10 by any means. On one hand it has a timeless fairy tale feel to it (and please, let's not confuse this for a story based in realism, it very much is a fairy tale) and on the other the story telling is fundamentally and sometimes insipidly plain. It's a good film with some great direction but I wouldn't rank it as the greatest film of the year, even more so compared to "Milk", "The Reader", "Revolutionary Road", "The Wrestler" or "Frost / Nixon" which all display superior plots, a higher caliber of acting, better cinematography and smarter scripts.
"Slumdog" will more than likely win best picture due to heavy Hollywood political reasons, and I won't have an issue with it because it's not a bad film and it seems to mean a great deal to a lot of people, but it's not as great as it's made out to be and certainly not a 10 out of 10, a nine maybe but no ten.
Posted By: Andrew John Mitchell, Newark DE (Guest) on February 05, 2009 at 09:35 AM
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.